|
DECEMBER
2006 :: COVER STORY : AUTOS
Traffic
Alert
Solutions
for America's Growing Congestion Problem
By Jennifer
Saranow
Staff Reporter of The Wall Street Journal
If it seems
like traffic is getting worse everywhere you go, you're not imagining
it.
The number of
cars on the road is rising faster than current highway systems can
accommodate and causing more traffic jams-not just in New York and
Los Angeles, but in Seattle and Austin, Texas, and dozens of other
places.
|
| The
Gist of It |
| Traffic
is getting worse, as growth in travel outpaces the capacity
of the transportation system |
The
traditional response to congestion problems has been to expand
roads, but that option is less and less feasible today
|
Transportation planners are now focusing on how to make more
efficient use of existing roadways by incorporating technology
and economic incentives
|
According to
the Texas Transportation Institute's 2005 report on 85 urban areas,
commuters in 2003 spent an average of 47 hours of extra time in
traffic delays-on top of what their commute would have been at the
speed limit-up from 16 hours in 1982 and 40 hours in 1993. And,
in all the areas studied, regardless of population size, there was
more severe congestion, lasting longer and affecting more roads.
The report predicts
that if things continue as they are, with growth in travel outpacing
improvement in the transportation system, urban areas will jump
to the next congestion-level classification by 2013. This means
that midsize regions like Omaha's will have traffic problems that
larger areas like Cleveland now have, and larger areas like Cleveland
will have the traffic problems that very large areas like New York
have now.
The traditional
response to congestion has been to build new road capacity. But
in many areas of the world, such expansion isn't feasible anymore
because of lack of funding, opposition from residents or simply
lack of room.
But that doesn't
mean you have to look forward to a future of being stuck in traffic.
While many transportation planners say more roads must be a part
of the congestion solution, they are increasingly focusing on how
to make more efficient use of existing roadways. Here's a look at
some of the innovative solutions spreading, and on the horizon,
for improving traffic flow:
RUBBING
OUT RUBBERNECKING
Accidents and stalled vehicles breed more congestion. They can block
parts of roads as well as cause backups when people slow down to
get a good look at what happened. By some estimates, for every minute
an incident is on the road, traffic flow takes four minutes to recover.
But a number
of transit agencies are starting to focus on "incident management,"
or getting crashes and stalled vehicles off roads and shoulders
as quickly as possible. In Houston, tow trucks from 11 companies,
contracted with the city, roam the freeways all day every day. When
they spot an incident, they call the city's traffic-management center,
where police locate the wreck or stalled vehicle on a freeway camera
and authorize the tow-truck driver to move it somewhere off the
road.
The program,
"SafeClear," which began as a pilot in 2004 and spread
citywide in January 2005, shortens the time it takes to detect a
disabled vehicle and clear it from the road, cutting delay times.
Before SafeClear's inception, police officers had to be dispatched
to the scene of an incident to authorize tows.
SafeClear has
contributed to a reduction of 730,000 hours in travel-time delays
and a 10% drop in the number of collisions for 2005 compared with
2003 and 2004.
Elsewhere, the
Washington state Department of Transportation is studying "rubbernecking
screens"-fabric walls that block the site of an accident from
passing motorists-as a way to reduce delays. The agency is evaluating
whether they help ease or add to congestion.
COMMUNICATION
Other efforts center on improving communication between
cars and roads. Most traffic signals change color based on historical
traffic flow at a given intersection, meaning they can't sense if
there's a long line of cars leaving a basketball game or shopping
center. But increasingly, a number of regions are adopting "adaptive"
traffic signals, which change color based on actual traffic flow.
The Road Commission
for Oakland County, Mich., near Detroit, added adaptive signals
to about 25 intersections over the past year and now has them at
650 of its 1,200 signaled intersections. Camera-like devices at
intersections count the number of cars moving in various directions,
and signals respond in a way to more efficiently handle the traffic.
Efforts are
also under way to enable signals to communicate with cars themselves.
In 1999, the Federal Communications Commission set aside radio frequencies
for communication between vehicles, and between roads and vehicles,
with the goal of preventing crashes and reducing congestion. Information
about road and traffic conditions-for instance, if a number of cars
suddenly put on their windshield wipers or brakes-could be collected
from vehicles as another source of data for what traffic signals
should display.
HOT
LANES Many transportation agencies increasingly are using
pricing to manage demand. For example, many are hoping to shorten
rush hour by putting in place "high-occupancy toll" lanes,
or "HOT" lanes, where solo drivers can pay electronic
tolls to use car-pool lanes. The theory is that some drivers will
be willing to pay to move into less-congested lanes.
Colorado has
converted some car-pool lanes in Denver to HOT lanes. Last year,
a similar lane opened near Minneapolis on I-394, and one runs for
eight miles on I-15 near San Diego.
In another example
of new pricing twists, a number of cities in Europe have started
charging people who want to drive their cars into city centers during
weekdays. The goal: to encourage use of public transportation and
reduce trip times for those on the roads. London introduced its
"congestion toll" in February 2003 and now charges drivers
the equivalent of about $14 to drive into the city center from 7
a.m. to 6:30 p.m. on weekdays.
ALTERNATIVE-TRANSIT
BONUS Federal and local governments are trying to encourage
employers to help better manage the demand for existing roadways.
The idea is that by offering employees incentives to get to work
by means other than single-occupant vehicles, employers could help
decrease the number of vehicles on the road and possibly increase
workers' satisfaction with their commute.
In May 2001,
the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency and the Department of Transportation
launched a program called "Best Workplaces for Commuters"
to encourage companies to offer commuter benefits. In addition to
gaining the designation of being a "Best Workplace for Commuters,"
participating companies are ranked based on the incentives they
offer.
To qualify,
companies must have 15% of their employees commuting to work by
a method other than a single-occupant vehicle. Companies also must
offer subsidized transit passes and van-pool vouchers, allow telecommuting,
and provide methods for rides home during emergencies (cab vouchers,
for instance). At the end of 2005, 1,443 employers participated
in the program, up from 1,143 at the end of 2004 and 21 during the
program's first month in 2001.
Many employers
are also making it easier for their employees to find car pools
or van pools by encouraging them to sign up for ride-matching Web
sites.
QUICK
NOTICE FOR DRIVERS By providing drivers with more information
about current traffic conditions and alternative routes, transportation
agencies hope to encourage people to avoid congested roads, and
thus avoid adding to the congestion.
In 2000, the
federal government designated 511 as the single traffic-information
telephone number for states and local jurisdictions nationwide.
According to the Federal Highway Administration, 21 states now have
511 systems in place, with most providing the information via 511
phone numbers and online.
The services
generally provide live traffic conditions, maps and travel times-more
than just the information about a few incidents provided by traditional
radio reports.
|