|
ARCHIVES ::
SEPTEMBER 2002 :: MARKETING
The
Tissue That Tanked
Marketing Miscues
Hobble a Much-Hyped Toilet Paper Product
By
Emily Nelson
Staff Reporter of The Wall Street Journal
Last year, Kimberly-Clark,
the company that makes Kleenex and Scott tissues, announced "the
most significant category innovation since toilet paper first appeared
in roll form in 1890." All major television networks, newspapers
-- even Jay Leno -- covered the news. The company predicted $150
million in sales its first year.
The product was Cottonelle
Fresh Rollwipes, a roll of moist wipes in a plastic dispenser that
clips onto a regular toilet-paper holder. The company's hope was
that Rollwipes would spur Americans to spend more on regular toilet
paper because they would use a wet wipe along with their regular
tissue. To back its effort, Kimberly-Clark cited its own research
showing that 63% of adults were already in the habit of wetting
toilet paper or using a wipe. Ultimately the company spent more
than $100 million to develop the roll and dispenser, which it guards
with more than 30 patents.
The payoff: almost
none. Today, Kimberly-Clark's big invention is still confined to
a regional market. Executives say sales are so small they aren't
financially significant.
'Splitting Hairs'
The failure of Rollwipes to catch on shows how hard it is for marketers
to invent -- or reinvent -- household staples. Consumers' closets
already are stuffed full of laundry detergents, fabric softeners,
special liquid soaps, even soap-coated wipes. Recent attempts to
launch contraptions for home dry-cleaning and water-purifying have
fallen flat.
"It used to be
easy. You had something that was new to the world, and your job
as a marketer was to just make sure people got it," says Marco
Marsan, a marketing consultant in Cincinnati who was hired in 1998
by Kimberly-Clark to review the design of an early Rollwipes prototype
with consumers. Today, Mr. Marsan says, "companies are splitting
hairs" to create new product categories.
On top of that, Kimberly-Clark
made its share of marketing mistakes. Hobbled by a product few can
discuss without blushing, the company never covered basics such
as showing consumers in its advertising and promotions what the
product does. Rollwipes' advertising agency, J. Walter Thompson,
aimed to create a fun image, with shots of people, from behind,
splashing in the water. The ads, which cost $35 million, carried
the slogan, "sometimes wetter is better." Experts quickly
criticized the ads for not clearly explaining the product -- or
helping to create demand. The company says it recently added more
explanatory print ads.
And in another marketing
flub, Kimberly-Clark didn't design Rollwipes in small trial sizes,
which meant it couldn't pass out free samples. Instead, it had scheduled
a van, outfitted with a mobile restroom and Rollwipes, to stop at
public places in the Southeast in mid-September. The road trip got
put on hold after the Sept. 11 terrorist attacks.
Another problem: Rollwipes,
unlike other wipes in boxes, come in a contraption that is conspicuous
in a bathroom -- another strike for people who are already bashful
about buying the product. A starter kit, which costs $8.99, includes
a beige plastic dispenser that clips onto the spindle of the regular
toilet tissue but is about the size of two rolls on top of each
other. "You do not want to have to ask someone to redecorate
your bathroom," says Tom Vierhile, president of a firm that
tracks new product launches.
Executives at Kimberly-Clark
decline to discuss Rollwipes. In a discussion with investors last
fall, Tom Falk, Kimberly-Clark's president and chief operating officer,
said the market for the product is "going to grow slower than
we thought." A Kimberly-Clark spokesman says, "There is
still a strong feeling that the product will be successful."
He adds, "I don't think it's fair to portray it that we're
disappointed with the product."
15 Minutes of Fame
In January 2001, Kimberly-Clark couldn't have been more optimistic.
It touted its invention to major news outlets and held a meeting
with Wall Street analysts and investors. Kimberly-Clark hoped that
the hype would create demand from consumers and persuade retailers
to make room on their shelves for Rollwipes.
And despite the product's
peculiar nature, experts weren't about to bet against Kimberly-Clark,
which is known for coming up with odd-sounding products that outsold
projections, including pull-on diapers and tissues in decorative
boxes. Moreover, Americans consume a lot of moist wipes in other
forms, for everything from removing makeup to cleaning their desks.
 |
|
Illustration:
Merle Nacht
|
But the product wasn't
ready to be shipped to stores for another six months. Kimberly-Clark
blames "a good part" of the delay on the late arrival
of manufacturing equipment. By July, most shoppers had forgotten
Rollwipes' 15 minutes of fame. "I know I've heard something
about it. I can't recall if it was a commercial or a comedian making
fun of it," says Rob Almond, director of housekeeping services
for a nursing home in Salem, Va., one of the markets where Rollwipes
are available. Mr. Almond has never purchased Rollwipes.
Joan Schneider, a marketing
consultant who studies product launches, also faults Kimberly-Clark
for wasting money on creating national hype when the product was
available only in certain Southern markets.
Unexpected competition
also hurt. Procter & Gamble, seeing the buzz generated by Kimberly-Clark's
announcement, wanted a me-too product. Seven weeks later, P&G
bought out John Marino, a small Boston inventor who had developed
Moist Mates, a simpler version of baby wipes on a roll. P&G
repackaged Moist Mates under the name Charmin Fresh Mates. P&G
shipped Fresh Mates to the same test markets as Rollwipes and started
advertising on television the same day.
A P&G spokeswoman
says P&G is happy with the product and declines to discuss any
expansion plans for "competitive" reasons.
|