|
CURRENT
ISSUE ::
DECEMBER 2002 :: EDUCATION
Copy
Cop
'Accidental
Entrepreneur'
Helps Schools
Tackle Plagiarism
By
BRAD REAGAN
Special to The Wall Street Journal
John
Barrie is a tattletale—and proud of it.
In
the mid-’90s, as a graduate student in biophysics, Mr. Barrie took
an interest in the growth of online “paper mills”—Web sites
that allow lazy students to download term papers for a small fee. He
decided to take technology from his field of research—analyzing
brain waves—and apply it to catching cheaters. Four years ago he
turned the operation into a for-profit company, iParadigms, of
Oakland, Calif.
Now,
the 34-year-old’s company is the digital plagiarist’s worst
nightmare. His company and its Web site, Turnitin.com,
help teachers at hundreds of U.S. high schools and universities, as
well as Oxford and Cambridge universities in Britain, monitor some
seven million students.
“They
should call me the accidental entrepreneur,” Mr. Barrie says.
“One day I woke up and, according to some people, I was the
country’s No. 1 plagiarism cop.”
We
talked with Mr. Barrie about his growing business and why he thinks
it could change the ethics of generations of students.
WSJ:
How did you get the idea for
this technology?
MR.
BARRIE: While a grad student back in 1994 [at the
University of California at Berkeley], I thought it would be cool to
let students read and peer-review other students’ papers over the
Internet. What I stumbled on with that experiment was that there was
a significant level of cheating with those students. And I stumbled
onto it because I had a steady stream of students coming into my
office telling me [through hearsay] that their fellow students were
cheating—taking papers off the Internet or using old papers.
I
used some of the brain-wave technology I was working on to check for
plagiarism. I was analyzing huge databases of brain waves to look
for irregularities. In the case of plagiarism, I’m looking for
regularities in text—overlapping and matching texts.
WSJ:
How does it work?
MR.
BARRIE: Once an institution licenses our service, faculty
members create Hotmail-like accounts on our service. They then tell
students to submit digital versions of their papers to the service.
At the point our computer receives the student paper, it creates a
digital fingerprint of that paper and we compare that fingerprint to
three databases.
The
No. 1 database [contains a copy of every Web page on] the Internet
that we update daily to the tune of 30 million pages per day
[including Internet-based term papers]; it’s very similar to the
principle behind any search engine.
No.
2 is a database of books and journals, including all of the
classics—“Moby-Dick,” Nietzsche’s “Beyond Good and
Evil,” etc. And database No. 3 is a database of every paper
we’ve received from every single one of our clients from Day 1.
Once
the computer compares the paper against those three databases, the
professor can see an exact copy of that paper with [selected
passages] underlined and color-coded. That underlined text was found
in one of [the database] sources verbatim. We don’t make the
judgment [of whether something has been plagiarized.] You make the
call. It’s going to be a cold day before any computer makes the
call of whether something has been plagiarized.
WSJ:
Is there a cat-and-mouse game between your company and the sites
that sell unoriginal works?
MR.
BARRIE: No, I would say that 85% of the cases of
plagiarism that we see are straight copies from the Internet—a
student uses the Internet like a 1.5 billion-page cut-and-paste-able
encyclopedia. I would say another 13% come from other student term
papers. Maybe half a percent comes from these cheat sites. I believe
that the media have significantly overestimated the value that free,
Internet-based term-paper mills hold for students. I also believe
that we will crush the remaining traditional term-paper mills [which
charge for papers] like a pestilent bug.
For-profit
term-paper mills cannot stay in business without selling the same
paper to multiple students. Since we compare every paper we receive
to every other term paper that has [been] submitted to us, the
student who buys a term paper may escape detection by us only until
we receive a second copy of that paper. …
I see our service as something that makes sure
all students are playing by the same set of rules, not a technology
to catch students cheating. If one of our clients, in my opinion, is
using it just to catch students cheating, that is a misuse of our
service. … [Letting the students know you will use the service is]
a mechanism to deter students from cheating. You will stop it even
before it starts.
|